Agentic Research Directory

Benchmark / dataset CORE-Bench authors

CORE-Bench

Benchmark evaluating whether agents can computationally reproduce published research artifacts.[14]

Workflow level n/a Source: Repository-documented Outcome: Not empirically evaluated here

Research applicability

Benchmark evaluating whether agents can computationally reproduce published research artifacts.[14]

Getting started

Begin from the CORE-Bench repository; set up isolated execution environments and run tasks with an agent harness, noting the README's recommendation of the Holistic Agent Leaderboard harness.

Maintenance

README recommends the Holistic Agent Leaderboard harness instead of the unmaintained original harness.

License

Not verified; consult upstream terms and dependency/data/model licences before adoption; no independent license audit performed.

Workflow & human oversight

Resource-level classification is intentionally unspecified; instantiated workflows may differ. Humans define objectives, control data access, and check outputs.

Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.

Approach

270 tasks from 90 papers across computer science, social science and medicine, written in Python or R, run in isolated execution environments.[14]

Limitations

No code run; running unfamiliar publication code requires sandboxing. The original harness is explicitly no longer actively maintained. Documentation review only - no software execution or independent performance validation.

Reproducibility

Stored primary-source extract research-wide/candidate-evidence-189.md, accessed 2026-10-15, read for this review. No software, model or claimed outcome reproduced.

Adoption requirements

Isolated execution environments, benchmark data and an agent/harness; potentially substantial compute.

Comments

No comments yet.

Add a comment

Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.

Submitting stores your comment text, the optional name and email, and a pseudonymised connection identifier used only for spam limiting (the raw IP address is not stored).