Benchmark / dataset CORE-Bench authors
CORE-Bench
Benchmark evaluating whether agents can computationally reproduce published research artifacts.[14]
Workflow level n/a Source: Repository-documented Outcome: Not empirically evaluated here
Research applicability
Benchmark evaluating whether agents can computationally reproduce published research artifacts.[14]
Getting started
Begin from the CORE-Bench repository; set up isolated execution environments and run tasks with an agent harness, noting the README's recommendation of the Holistic Agent Leaderboard harness.
Maintenance
README recommends the Holistic Agent Leaderboard harness instead of the unmaintained original harness.
License
Not verified; consult upstream terms and dependency/data/model licences before adoption; no independent license audit performed.
Workflow & human oversight
Resource-level classification is intentionally unspecified; instantiated workflows may differ. Humans define objectives, control data access, and check outputs.
Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.
Approach
270 tasks from 90 papers across computer science, social science and medicine, written in Python or R, run in isolated execution environments.[14]
Limitations
No code run; running unfamiliar publication code requires sandboxing. The original harness is explicitly no longer actively maintained. Documentation review only - no software execution or independent performance validation.
Reproducibility
Stored primary-source extract research-wide/candidate-evidence-189.md, accessed 2026-10-15, read for this review. No software, model or claimed outcome reproduced.
Adoption requirements
Isolated execution environments, benchmark data and an agent/harness; potentially substantial compute.
Comments
No comments yet.
Add a comment
Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.