Research agent: local research notebook and literature brief
Repository-documented local research notebook with a literature-screening workflow, dated AI logs and a researcher decision inbox. The README describes title, abstract and full-paper screening and a compact reading selection; it does not demonstrate scientific discovery.
Workflow level n/a Source: Repository-documented Outcome: Not empirically evaluated here
Research applicability
Supports literature triage, evidence logging and researcher-controlled project decisions. Hardware control is explicitly outside the kit.
Getting started
Editorial suggestion, not executed: read the cited primary source, preserve its limitations and design a small researcher-supervised trial before reuse.
Maintenance
No maintenance or operational availability assurance.
License
Rights and licensing must be checked before reuse; not audited here.
Workflow & human oversight
Resource-level automation is unspecified. Researchers choose questions, evaluation design and decisions; documentation review is not workflow execution.
Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.
Limitations
README-only documentation review; no code execution or scientific outcomes reproduced. The experimental-qubit vault, people, papers and numerical results are explicitly fictional/synthetic. Relevance scores are reading priorities, not scientific quality. License and maintenance not audited.
Reproducibility
Source documentation reviewed only; no code, model outputs or scientific outcomes independently reproduced.
Adoption requirements
README requires uv, private configuration and a signed-in Codex CLI; model calls may incur cost. Keep real notes, author mappings, credentials and backups private. Obsidian is optional; task queries require its Tasks plugin.
Comments
No comments yet.
Add a comment
Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.