Academic Research Skills: source-traceable literature and writing workflows

Research applicability

Primary README and one pinned literature-synthesis skill substantively document reusable academic AI procedures and explicit author responsibility. Recommend the intended workflow resource, with no completed-study or benefit claim.

Getting started

Editorial untested suggestion: begin by reading the linked pinned primary documentation, define a small non-sensitive research task and researcher checks before considering separately authorised execution.

Maintenance

Dated source snapshot only; present availability, maintenance and version parity require separate checks.

License

Source visibility is not reuse clearance; source/model/data licenses and rights require separate checking.

Workflow & human oversight

Scope: Source-described intended research use only; no execution or benefit independently verified Human control: Human authors retain research decisions, disclosures, approval and submission; lead checks and integrates returns. This describes source controls, not human review of this packet. Stage connections: Human-selected workflows connect source discovery, source-grounded extraction and synthesis; the lead checks evidence and integrates bounded returns. No system-planned research loop observed. Stopping: Lead supplies acceptance criteria, budget and stopping condition; no empirical convergence or autonomous publication claimed. Missing evidence: Only README and deep-research skill inspected; other eleven workflows and live assistant execution were not assessed.

Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.

Approach

- Document searches, read sources, extract and compare evidence, prepare a traceable synthesis and handoff

Outcomes (as reported by the originating team)

Documented method or intended capability; no empirical research benefit established by this review.

Limitations

- Documentation only; no candidate installation, assistant invocation, software validation or completed-study replication. - Twelve-workflow count is README-described; detailed inspection covered one skill. - Source access and integrations depend on the user environment; no external capabilities or permission are supplied by Markdown instructions. - AI editorial review; no human editorial verification claimed.

Reproducibility

AI editorial source review only. No candidate code, model, agent, experiment or reported outcome independently executed or reproduced.

Adoption requirements

Editorial suggestions only, untested. Check source/version, rights, data handling, model and environment prerequisites before any separately authorised adoption; this review installs or invokes nothing.