AI Bubble Stress Engine

Author-described financial research project prepared with Claude assistance that scores stress in the AI investment cycle from public evidence, records counter-evidence and states conditions that would change its verdict.

L1Task assistance Source Repository-documented Outcome Author-reported

Evidence & verification

Source level

Repository-documented
Grounded in a maintainer repository/README. Availability, stars and forks do not establish research benefit or correctness.

Outcome verification

Author-reported
Outcomes are reported by the team that built the system. The entry is source-checked against the team's own publications; not independently reproduced.

Sources checked

2026-10-17 (UTC)

Primary README-only capability review. Disclosure establishes actual AI assistance, not autonomous operation. Automatic updates identifies only two refreshed series and explicitly manual remaining inputs. Known weaknesses and current reading conflict, so exact indicator counts and current stress values are excluded from the resource summary. Robustness describes weight sensitivity, not predictive validation.

Source-checked does not mean independently reproduced. See the Method page for how these labels are assigned.

Sources (1)

Research applicability

Illustrates AI-assisted financial research with explicit assumptions, counter-evidence and uncertainty; it does not establish predictive accuracy.

Getting started

Editorial, untested guidance: inspect the protocol, methodology and source-linked indicator files; resolve README version inconsistencies and independently check inputs before considering the documented Python scoring command.

Maintenance

Moving README snapshot only; ongoing maintenance not verified.

License

Rights and licence terms not independently audited.

Workflow & human oversight

Researcher-directed AI assistance; humans choose objectives, inspect sources and approve outputs. L1 denotes disclosed assistance, not autonomous collection or scoring.

Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.

Limitations

README-only review; scoring code, underlying indicators and tests were not executed or audited. README current block says 18 indicators while the known-weakness section says 17, and robustness prose retains 58 while the current block shows 57: version drift is unresolved. Judgment-heavy inputs, unconfirmed private-company figures and no historical backtesting limit inference. Not investment advice.

Reproducibility

No installation, execution, experiment or independent outcome reproduction.

Adoption requirements

Python 3 according to README; analyst judgment and independently checked public financial sources. Verify dataset permissions and private-company claims. Retain researcher oversight and do not use the stress index as a validated trading signal.

Comments

No comments yet.

Add a comment

Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.