Literature reviews and AI — responsible review exercises
A source-documented tutorial for researcher-led AI assistance in literature review. Exercises cover Boolean-query drafting, second screening and checking generated references. This is teaching guidance, not an evaluated review agent or a verified systematic-review result.
L2Research workflow (workflow level, not a quality rating) Source: Repository-documented Outcome: Not empirically evaluated here
Research applicability
A source-documented tutorial for researcher-led AI assistance in literature review. Exercises cover Boolean-query drafting, second screening and checking generated references. This is teaching guidance, not an evaluated review agent or a verified systematic-review result.
Getting started
Read the retained primary snapshot and its limitations first. Any suggested installation/provider/database use is untested and requires separate authorization.
Maintenance
Snapshot checked 2026-10-20; ongoing maintenance and version parity were not established.
License
License statements were not separately audited; source access is not reuse clearance.
Workflow & human oversight
L2 for this documented use: Researchers frame a question, ask a model for query terms or screening suggestions, compare those outputs with known papers or human screening, and check cited references. Human control: The exercises direct the researcher to test queries on known relevant papers or consult a librarian, compare screening suggestions with human screeners, and check five generated references. Boundary: The slides hide their reference lists pending verification. Secondary tool-performance figures and cited policy claims were not checked against their original publications and are excluded from this entry. The tutorial's five delegation labels are not the directory's four workflow levels. No tool, review or exercise was executed.
Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.
Approach
Researchers frame a question, ask a model for query terms or screening suggestions, compare those outputs with known papers or human screening, and check cited references.
Outcomes (as reported by the originating team)
No empirical research benefit is established by this documentary review.
Limitations
The slides hide their reference lists pending verification. Secondary tool-performance figures and cited policy claims were not checked against their original publications and are excluded from this entry. The tutorial's five delegation labels are not the directory's four workflow levels. No tool, review or exercise was executed.
Reproducibility
Primary-source documentation was read, with source snapshots and hashes retained. No candidate code, skill, model, experimental system or claimed outcome was executed or reproduced.
Adoption requirements
Untested editorial suggestion: inspect the exact sources and select a bounded authorized task; check data rights, provider terms and outputs before relying on them. No installation or trial was run.
Comments
No comments yet.
Add a comment
Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.