mattkari/source-grounded-rag

A research prototype answers questions against an authorized scholarly collection with page-level provenance, labelled interpretation and a refusal path. Documentation describes intended use; research outcomes were not independently evaluated.

L1Task assistance Source Repository-documented Outcome Not empirically evaluated here

Evidence & verification

Source level

Repository-documented
Grounded in a maintainer repository/README. Availability, stars and forks do not establish research benefit or correctness.

Outcome verification

Not empirically evaluated here
A documented resource or intended workflow, not a demonstrated academic outcome. No empirical benefit is established by its inclusion.

Sources checked

2026-11-01 (UTC)

AI source review of documentation. Identity/version: primary snapshot matches this queued resource; exact upstream release/byte parity is not generally verified. Source classification is not a correctness or research-benefit guarantee.

Source-checked does not mean independently reproduced. See the Method page for how these labels are assigned.

Sources (1)

Research applicability

A research prototype answers questions against an authorized scholarly collection with page-level provenance, labelled interpretation and a refusal path.

Getting started

Editorial suggestion: read the primary source and limitations before adapting any method; no installation or trial performed.

Maintenance

Source snapshot checked 2026-11-01; ongoing maintenance, installed behavior and current-version parity not generally verified.

License

Consult original licence and data/provider terms; source access is not reuse clearance. No licence/rights audit or installation was performed.

Workflow & human oversight

Scoped L1: A researcher asks a bounded question and checks answer passages/page citations; README explicitly leaves decisions to the researcher. This supports single-question source-grounded assistance, not an autonomous literature review. Human control/boundary: A researcher asks a bounded question and checks answer passages/page citations; README explicitly leaves decisions to the researcher. This supports single-question source-grounded assistance, not an autonomous literature review.

Workflow level is not an evidence score; higher is not better evidence.

Approach

A research prototype answers questions against an authorized scholarly collection with page-level provenance, labelled interpretation and a refusal path. Documented steps: A research prototype answers questions against an authorized scholarly collection with page-level provenance, labelled interpretation and a refusal path.

Outcomes (as reported by the originating team)

Author reports or documentation only, not independently reproduced. No independent reproduction was performed here.

Limitations

The documented main demo corpus is one English doctoral thesis. Hallucination reduction and research benefit are not established here; requires Python 3.11+, OpenAI embeddings and Anthropic generation credentials.

Reproducibility

Primary-source text was read and preserved with provenance hashes. No candidate code, model, benchmark, data upload or claimed outcome was executed/reproduced.

Adoption requirements

Verify research scope, data rights, tool requirements and outputs before use; these editorial suggestions were not executed.

Comments

No comments yet.

Add a comment

Comments are held for moderation before appearing. Critical or corrective comments are welcome — especially evidence that an entry overstates what has been verified.